Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15449

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : PC32 - PC35 Full Version

Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes of Fontan Procedure in Single Ventricular Repair: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64784.18644
Gradlin Roy Justin, Revanth Maramreddy, Sirisha Peesapati, Sachin Mahajan

1. Junior Consultant, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, MIOT Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, ESI Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Revanth Maramreddy,
#B 1001, Royal Embassy, Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: revanthmbbs@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Fontan operation is a surgical technique used to treat cyanotic heart diseases with single ventricle physiology. Although it has undergone several modifications since its inception in 1971, it is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Aim: To examine the outcomes of the Fontan operation and identify various risk factors associated with it.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in Chandigarh, India from January 2014 to December 2017. All patients who underwent the Fontan operation at PGIMER were included in the study. The study analysed outcomes such as survival, arrhythmias, neurological complications, heart failure, cirrhosis, and Protein Losing Enteropathy (PLE) following the Fontan operation. Various risk factors that could potentially influence the outcome of the Fontan operation were assessed, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25.0. The Chi-square test was utilised to determine predictors of survival and other long-term outcomes, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 35 patients underwent the Fontan operation during the study period and completed five years of follow-up. Out of these, 28 were known to be alive at the last contact. There were six early deaths (less than one year). The overall one-year and five-year survival rates from the time of the operation were 29 (83%) and 28 (80%), respectively. Graft thrombosis/thromboembolism was observed in three cases (8.6%) and neurological complications in three cases (8.6%) during the early postoperative period. Arrhythmias in 6 cases (14%) were the most common late postoperative complication.

Conclusion: The Fontan procedure is currently the best available palliative treatment for cyanotic heart diseases with single ventricle physiology. Patient selection is crucial in this procedure, as the presence of risk factors may adversely affect the outcome.

Keywords

Fontan operation, Pulmonary artery pressure, Protein losing enteropathy

In 1971, Francis Fontan and Eugene Baudet from Bordeaux, France, described a surgical technique that bypassed the hypoplastic right ventricle by creating a direct atrio-pulmonary connection. This technique completely separated the systemic and pulmonary circulation in patients with tricuspid atresia (1),(2). The procedure resulted in improved oxygenation, functional status, and enhanced quality of life and survival for the majority of patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease and single ventricle physiology. Over time, this technique has been successfully applied to treat various forms of functional single ventricle physiology (3).

Following the discovery of the Fontan circulation and its advantages, detailed studies on its physiology have revealed the critical importance of avoiding flow disturbances and energy losses in the constructed pathway. This understanding led to the development of the Total Cavo Pulmonary Connection (TCPC), which offers the least energy loss and flow disturbance pathway, overcoming the limitations of the classical atrio-pulmonary Fontan connection. Initially introduced as the lateral atrial tunnel, the TCPC concept later evolved into extracardiac or intracardiac conduits. Another significant surgical advancement was the introduction of fenestration and staging with a superior cavopulmonary connection (4).

However, the Fontan procedure is associated with several complications, including arrhythmias, premature death, ventricular failure, thromboembolic diseases, liver disease, and Protein-Losing Enteropathy (PLE). Although many risk factors determining the outcome of the Fontan procedure have been published in the literature (5),(6),(7), limited data is available from the Indian subcontinent. This study primarily focuses on the early and late outcomes of patients undergoing the Fontan operation and analyses various risk factors associated with these outcomes in the Indian population.

Material and Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh, India. Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval was obtained (INT/IEC/2019/001599).

Inclusion criteria: The study included all patients with single ventricle physiology who underwent the Fontan operation at PGIMER between January 2014 and December 2017.

Exclusion criteria: Emergency surgeries were excluded from the study.

Medical records of the patients were analysed to collect preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative details. Data analysis was conducted in January 2023.

The following parameters were noted:

• Functional health status was assessed based on the current New York Heart Association (NYHA) status/six-min walk test.
• Data on deaths were updated through correspondence with physicians and the patients’ family members. The survival analysis included all deaths after the Fontan operation, regardless of the cause.
• Postoperative complications were noted, and PLE was diagnosed based on documentation of enteric loss or the presence of a low total protein/albumin ratio in addition to persistent or intermittent oedema.
• Clinically significant arrhythmia was defined as the need for antiarrhythmic drug therapy (excluding digoxin), pacemaker placement, or electrical/pharmacological cardioversion, and the results of the Holter study were considered.
• Cirrhosis was diagnosed based on characteristic findings on ultrasound and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, in conjunction with clinical diagnosis by a gastroenterologist. Patients with isolated liver function or ultrasound abnormalities were not considered to have proven cirrhosis. Heart failure and valve dysfunction were assessed through echocardiographic examination.
• Various risk factors that could potentially affect the outcome of the Fontan operation were assessed, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors.
• Preoperative risk factors included the participant’s age at the time of the Fontan operation, SpO2 levels, previous Bidirectional Glenn procedure, Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP), heart rhythm, type of systemic ventricle, and Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries (MAPCA).
• Intraoperative risk factors included the type of Fontan procedure and atrioventricular valve intervention during the Fontan operation.
• Postoperative risk factors included chest tube duration, chylous effusions, low cardiac output, renal insufficiency, and reoperation before 30 days of surgery. Their association with outcomes was analysed.
• A five-year follow-up was conducted for all patients, and outcomes such as survival rate, pulmonary thromboembolism, neurological complications, arrhythmias, cirrhosis, and PLE were analysed at the end of the first year (early outcomes) and at the end of the fifth year (late outcomes).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 25.0. Descriptive statistics for categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square test was utilised to identify predictors of survival and other long-term outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 35 patients underwent the Fontan operation during the study period and completed five years of follow-up. Out of these, 28 were known to be alive at the last contact. The overall one-year and five-year survival rates from the time of the operation were 29 (83%) and 28 (80%) respectively (Table/Fig 1).

Among the 25 male patients who underwent the operation, 20 were alive, and out of the 10 female patients, 8 were alive. The five-year survival rate was 80% in both groups. No difference in long-term outcomes was noted between the two groups (p-value >0.9). There were no intraoperative deaths. Six early deaths occurred within one year of surgery, of which three patients died within 30 days of surgery. Among these three immediate postoperative deaths, two patients had undergone the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure, and one had undergone the extracardiac Fontan procedure. All 33immediate postoperative deaths were associated with persistent low cardiac output and high post-bypass Fontan pressure (>20 mm of Hg). In the other three deaths that occurred within one year of surgery, two patients who underwent the extracardiac Fontan procedure died within two months of follow-up due to graft thrombosis and collateral formation leading to heart failure and multiorgan dysfunction. The third patient, who had undergone the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure, died 81 days postoperatively due to persistent low output state, bilateral chylothorax, PLE, multisystem organ failure, and sepsis. One late death occurred beyond one year of surgery. This patient had developed ongoing heart failure with an ejection fraction of 35% and associated PLE and serious pleural effusion, eventually resulting in death due to sepsis.

Out of the 28 patients on follow-up, 26 patients were in New York Heart Association functional Class-I, and two were in Class-II. During follow-up, all patients were able to complete the 6 Min Walk Test, with an average distance of 650 meters. All patients were on anticoagulants (Acitrom) for six months, followed by lifelong antiplatelet therapy. However, within two months of follow-up, two patients developed graft thrombosis associated with PLE and heart failure. They eventually died due to ongoing sepsis. One patient had isolated pulmonary thromboembolism involving the segmental branches during 10 months of follow-up. He received anticoagulation for two years and eventually showed improvement. Two patients developed cerebral oedema, likely due to raised intracranial pressure resulting from venous congestion involving the head and neck. One patient underwent decompressive craniotomy, and both patients recovered with some residual neurological deficits. One patient experienced a focal seizure but made a complete recovery. Three patients experienced arrhythmias in the postoperative period, and five patients had low cardiac output requiring high inotropic support.

Follow-up was available for all 28 surviving patients. All of them have had recent electrocardiograms, and 50% of the patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory Holter monitoring. Among the total of 23 patients, all were in normal sinus rhythm. One patient experienced brief supraventricular tachycardia of more than four consecutive beats, one patient had intermittent junctional rhythm, and three patients had occasional ventricular ectopics.

Out of the 35 patients, one developed PLE (Pleural Effusion) and serious pleural effusions that required tube thoracostomy four years after the operation. However, this patient unfortunately passed away due to persistent low cardiac output and ongoing sepsis. In present study, no patient exhibited clinical or radiological evidence of cirrhosis.

During the follow-up period beyond one year, reduced function of the systemic ventricle with an EF of less than 40% was observed in only two patients. Unfortunately, one of these patients died during follow-up, while the other is currently receiving antifailure treatment.

Four patients had mild Atrioventricular Valve Regurgitation (AVVR), and none of the patients experienced severe AVVR or required valve replacement during the follow-up period.

Among the seven preoperative risk factors analysed, only SpO2 >70%, PAP >15 mmHg, and prior BDG were significantly associated with poor outcomes (Table/Fig 2).

Out of the three intraoperative risk factors analysed, only post-bypass Fontan pressure exceeding 20 mmHg was associated with a poor outcome (Table/Fig 3).

Lateral tunnel Fontan was performed in 18 patients, while extracardiac Fontan was constructed in 17 patients. There was no significant difference in early and late mortality between the two groups. None of the patients underwent AV valve repair or replacement. Only four patients experienced post-bypass Fontan pressure exceeding 20 mmHg. Among these patients, three died in the immediate postoperative period due to persistent low cardiac output, renal failure, and shock. This factor was significantly associated with poor outcomes in early survival (p-value <0.001).

Among all the postoperative risk factors analysed, only Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) and postoperative renal failure were associated with poor survival before one year (Table/Fig 4). However, they did not impact the long-term outcome of the patients.

Discussion

Managing patients with single ventricle physiology poses great challenges. The identification of risk factors in these patients has significantly aided in better patient selection and management, leading to a reduction in mortality rates for those undergoing the Fontan procedure (5),(6),(7).

In our series, there were six early deaths. The overall one-year and five-year survival rates from the time of the operation were 83% and 80%, respectively. These figures are comparable to earlier reports from The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the Mayo Clinic (6), where the one-year survival rate was 77%, the five-year survival rate was 70%, and the ten-year survival rate was 60%. The improved early outcomes can be attributed to enhanced patient selection, the use of fenestration, and advancements in perfusion strategies, anaesthesia, and intensive care management over the past decade.

As an extension of Choussat et al.,’s ten commandments for the ideal Fontan circulation (8), authors were able to demonstrate poor outcomes in patients with SpO2 >70%, PAP >15 mmHg, prior BDG, post-bypass Fontan pressure >20 mmHg, post-op LCOS, and RF. Interestingly, present study showed no significant difference in outcomes among patients operated on before the age of four, which deviates from the findings of Choussat et al.,’s ten commandments for the ideal Fontan circulation. The morphology of the systemic ventricle did not affect survival in present study, consistent with many other reports (9),(10). The association of high oxygen saturation and previous BD Glenn procedure with poor outcomes was not supported by the literature.

The impact of AVVR in patients who have survived the Fontan operation is significant. Even moderate AVVR can lead to the failure of Fontan circulation, necessitating early intervention or cardiac transplantation (11),(12). However, none of the patients in present study developed significant valvular regurgitation during follow-up.

In present study, arrhythmia (14%) was the most common complication in the late postoperative period, followed by heart failure (6%) and PLE (3%). These findings align with other studies (5),(6),(7),(10), where arrhythmias were observed in around 20% of cases and PLE occurred in 6-7%. It is recommended annual follow-up with routine clinical examination and echocardiography for all patients, while ECG/Holter monitoring is reserved for selected patients with a history of arrhythmias. The risk of arrhythmia is high in the classical atrio-pulmonary type of Fontan connection, leading many centres to adopt the extracardiac conduit technique (13),(14). Several studies have suggested that sudden death in this patient group during follow-up is mainly attributed to arrhythmias (15),(16). PLE is estimated to occur in 3-8% of Fontan survivors (17),(18). Reversing PLE can be particularly challenging and is associated with poor survival (7),(19),(20). Thrombosis and thromboembolism are well-known complications, accounting for upto 9% of deaths in long-term follow-up (7),(21). In many cases, thrombotic events after Fontan are likely multifactorial, involving factors such as intestinal protein loss, diminished hepatic synthesis of anticoagulant proteins, and/or sluggish flow in the systemic venous to pulmonary arterial circulation (22).

Limitation(s)

Since it was a retrospective study, data on the incidence of early transient postoperative events, such as arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and LCOS, could be underestimated. Additionally, the cause of sudden deaths during follow-up could not be established in all patients.

Conclusion

Good outcomes have been achieved in patients undergoing the Fontan operation for single ventricular physiology. However, poor outcomes have been associated with high pulmonary artery pressure, previous bidirectional Glenn procedure, elevated oxygen saturation before the Fontan procedure, increased pressures in the Fontan circulation, low cardiac output, and renal failure after the Fontan procedure.

References

1.
Fontan F, Mounicot FB, Baudet E, Simonneau J, Gordo J, Gouffrant JM. “Correction” de l’atrésie tricuspidienne. Rapport de deux cas “corrigés” par l’utilisation d’une technique chirurgicale nouvelle [“Correction” of tricuspid atresia. 2 cases “corrected” using a new surgical technic]. Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc. 1971;10(1):39-47. French. PMID: 5101717.
2.
Kreutzer G, Galíndez E, Bono H, De Palma C, Laura JP. An operation for the correction of tricuspid atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;66(4):613-21. PMID: 4518787. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mott AR, Spray TL, Gaynor JW, Godinez RI, Nicolson SC, Steven JM, et al. Improved early results with cavopulmonary connections. Cardiology in the Young. Cambridge University Press. 2001;11(1):03-11. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
de Leval MR, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C. Total cavopulmonary connection: A logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex fontan operations: Experimental studies and early clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96(5):682-95. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Dennis M, Zannino D, du Plessis K, Bullock A, Disney PJS, Radford DJ, et al. Clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults after the fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):1009-17. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.054. PMID: 29495980. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Driscoll DJ, Offord KP, Feldt RH, Schaff HV, Puga FJ, Danielson GK. Five- to fifteen-year follow-up after fontan operation. Circulation. 1992;85(2):469-96. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.2.469. PMID: 1735145. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Khairy P, Fernandes SM, Mayer JE Jr, Triedman JK, Walsh EP, Lock JE, et al. Long-term survival, modes of death, and predictors of mortality in patients with fontan surgery. Circulation. 2008;117(1):85-92. Doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.738559. Epub 2007 Dec 10. PMID: 18071068. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Stern HJ. Fontan “Ten Commandments” Revisited and Revised. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31:1131-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-010-9811-9. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Allen KY, Downing TE, Glatz AC, Rogers LS, Ravishankar C, Rychik J, et al. Effect of fontan-associated morbidities on survival with intact fontan circulation. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(11):1866-71. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PMID: 28385177. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Atz AM, Zak V, Mahony L, Uzark K, D’agincourt N, Goldberg DJ, et al. Pediatric heart network investigators. Longitudinal outcomes of patients with single ventricle after the fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(22):2735-44. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.582. PMID: 28571639; PMCID: PMC5604334. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
King G, Ayer J, Celermajer D, Zentner D, Justo R, Disney P, et al. Atrioventricular valve failure in fontan palliation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(7):810-22. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.025. PMID: 30784675. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Stephens EH, Dearani JA. Management of the bad atrioventricular valve in fontan time for a change. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(6):1643-48. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.129. Epub 2019 Oct 18. PMID: 31635860. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Pundi KN, Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA, Li Z, Driscoll DJ, et al. Sudden cardiac death and late arrhythmias after the fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(1):17-23. Doi: 10.1111/chd.12401. Epub 2016 Aug 22. PMID: 27545004. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Li D, Fan Q, Hirata Y, Ono M, An Q. Arrhythmias after fontan operation with intra-atrial lateral tunnel versus extra-cardiac conduit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(4):873-80. Doi: 10.1007/s00246-017- 1595-8. Epub 2017 Mar 7. PMID: 28271152. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Rijnberg FM, Blom NA, Sojak V, Kuipers IM, Rammeloo LAJ, Jongbloed MRM, et al. A 45-year experience with the Fontan procedure: Tachyarrhythmia, an important sign for adverse outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;29(3):461-68. Doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz111. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sakamoto T, Nagashima M, Hiramatsu T, Matsumura G, Park IS, Yamazaki K. Fontan circulation over 30 years. What should we learn from those patients? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016;24(8):765-71. Doi: 10.1177/0218492316667771. Epub 2016 Aug 24. PMID: 27563102. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Schumacher KR, Stringer KA, Donohue JE, Yu S, Shaver A, Caruthers RL, et al. Fontan-associated protein-losing enteropathy and plastic bronchitis. J Pediatr. 2015;166(4):970-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.068. Epub 2015 Feb 4. PMID: 25661406; PMCID: PMC4564862. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mertens L, Hagler DJ, Sauer U, Somerville J, Gewillig M. Protein-losing enteropathy after the fontan operation: An International multicenter study. PLE study group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(5):1063-73. Doi: 10.1016/ s0022-5223(98)70406-4. PMID: 9605076. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA, Pundi KN, Li Z, Hinck CA, et al. 40-year follow-up after the fontan operation: Long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(15):1700-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.065. PMID: 26449141. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Alsaied T, Bokma JP, Engel ME, Kuijpers JM, Hanke SP, Zuhlke L, et al. Predicting long-term mortality after fontan procedures: A risk score based on 6707 patients from 28 studies. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(4):393-98. Doi: 10.1111/ chd.12468. Epub 2017 May 8. PMID: 28480627. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Egbe AC, Connolly HM, Niaz T, Yogeswaran V, Taggart NW, Qureshi MY, et al. Prevalence and outcome of thrombotic and embolic complications in adults after fontan operation. Am Heart J. 2017;183:10-17. Doi: 10.1016/j. ahj.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 4. PMID: 27979032. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Attard C, Huang J, Monagle P, Ignjatovic V. Pathophysiology of thrombosis and anticoagulation post fontan surgery. Thromb Res. 2018;172:204-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 14. PMID: 29685556.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64784.18644

Date of Submission: Apr 17, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 19, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 29, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 31, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com